For New Zealand business owners the bank has said no to. Talk to a lending specialist: 03 667 4222

Guide · Directors

Directors' duties when your company is struggling

When a New Zealand company is under financial pressure, directors must still act in good faith in its best interests, must not trade in a way that creates a substantial risk of serious loss to creditors, and must not let the company take on obligations unless they reasonably believe it can meet them. Acting early — getting advice, dealing with IRD, and finding realistic funding — is the best protection for the business and for the directors.

By the Difficult Business Loans editorial teamUpdated 27 September 20264 minute read

Key points

  • Section 135 of the Companies Act prohibits reckless trading.
  • Section 136 prohibits taking on obligations the company can't reasonably meet.
  • When insolvency looms, creditors' interests become central to directors' decisions.
  • The Supreme Court's 2023 Mainzeal decision showed directors can face major personal liability.
  • A realistic funding plan that pays creditors can be part of acting responsibly.

Why this matters now

New Zealand has been through a hard few years for business. Company liquidations in 2025 were the highest in roughly fifteen years, and Inland Revenue has become far more active in pursuing overdue tax through the courts. In that environment, more directors are asking the same question: what am I supposed to do when the company can’t pay everyone?

This guide gives a plain-English overview. It isn’t legal advice. If your company’s solvency is in question, a lawyer who works in this area is worth every dollar.

The duties that matter most under pressure

The Companies Act 1993 sets out several duties. These are the ones that come into sharp focus when money is tight.

Act in good faith and in the company’s best interests (section 131)

Directors must act in good faith and in what they believe to be the company’s best interests. As a company approaches insolvency, the courts have made clear that the interests of creditors become an important part of that assessment.

Don’t trade recklessly (section 135)

A director must not agree to, cause or allow the company’s business to be carried on in a way likely to create a substantial risk of serious loss to its creditors. This isn’t a ban on trading while things are hard. It’s about whether continuing to trade, in the way you’re doing it, is creating a substantial risk of serious loss.

Don’t take on obligations the company can’t meet (section 136)

A director must not agree to the company incurring an obligation unless they believe, on reasonable grounds, that the company will be able to perform it when required. Taking a deposit for work you can’t complete, or ordering stock you know you can’t pay for, are classic examples of where this bites.

Exercise care, diligence and skill (section 137)

Directors must exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonable director would in the same circumstances. That includes keeping informed about the company’s financial position.

The Mainzeal decision

In 2023 the Supreme Court decided Yan v Mainzeal Property and Construction Ltd (in liquidation), one of the most significant cases on directors’ duties in New Zealand. The court found the directors of the construction company had breached their duties by allowing it to keep trading while insolvent, relying on support from a parent group that wasn’t legally committed. The directors were held personally liable for substantial sums.

The broad lesson for small business directors: hoping things will improve isn’t a plan. Continuing to trade needs a reasonable, evidence-based basis.

What responsible action looks like

SituationResponsible response
Cash is tight but the business is viableBuild a cash flow forecast; deal with IRD and creditors early; consider funding
IRD arrears are growingEngage with IRD; arrange instalments or pay out; keep current tax paid
A statutory demand arrivesAct within the deadlines; pay, settle or dispute properly
Losses continue every month with no fixTake professional advice about formal options
You’re unsure whether the company is solventGet legal and accounting advice promptly

Where funding fits

Borrowing isn’t automatically risky from a duties point of view. A loan on sensible terms that clears IRD and pressing creditors, where there’s a reasonable basis to believe the company can meet the new repayments, can reduce the risk to creditors rather than increase it. Creditors get paid, penalties stop, and the business trades on with one manageable obligation.

What matters is the basis for the decision. That’s why lenders, and your own records, should show:

  • what the money pays for;
  • a 13-week cash flow forecast showing the loan fits;
  • a realistic exit, such as a bank refinance or sale.

Property-secured business loans through our lending partners range from $20,000 to $1m and can pay IRD and creditors directly at settlement. Unsecured options exist for businesses with steady turnover.

Signs you should get advice now

  • You’re choosing each week which creditor to pay.
  • IRD has issued a deduction notice or court papers.
  • A statutory demand has been served.
  • You’re taking deposits to pay for older jobs.
  • Your accountant has used the word “insolvent”.

None of these means the business is finished. They mean decisions need to be deliberate and documented.

Personal exposure beyond the duties

Directors can also be exposed through personal guarantees, which survive liquidation. Our guide on how personal guarantees work explains more.

A last word

Most directors who get into difficulty are honest people doing their best. The law generally recognises that business involves risk. What it expects is that directors face the problem, take advice, and make reasonable decisions. If a funding plan is part of that, start an enquiry and a lending specialist will talk it through.

Quick answers

Does borrowing to pay IRD breach my duties?

Not in itself. Borrowing on sensible terms to clear debts, where there's a reasonable basis to believe the company can meet the new loan, is a normal commercial decision. The question is always whether the decision is reasonable on the information available. Take legal advice if you're unsure.

Are shadow directors or people acting as directors covered?

The Companies Act's definition of director can extend to people who act as directors or whose instructions the board is accustomed to follow. If you're effectively running a company, assume the duties apply.

Is this legal advice?

No. This guide is a general overview only. Directors facing solvency questions should get advice from a lawyer about their specific situation.